Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen vs Vanja Gudelj Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does Olsen's second serve compare to Gudelj's? Over the past six months, Olsen has secured 38.68% of points on their second serve, slightly less effective than Gudelj who has won 39.52%.
• Which player excels in returning their opponent's second serve in recent form? Gudelj seems stronger here, winning 59.02% of these points compared to Olsen's 52.79%.
• What about their first serve return success rates? Interestingly, Olsen outperforms Gudelj with a 40.13% success rate against Gudelj's 31.98%.
• Under pressure, who handles breakpoints more effectively? Olsen has saved 42.97% of breakpoints, slightly better than Gudelj's 38.46%.
• Comparing overall performance, who has the higher winning percentage in the past year? Olsen tops Gudelj with a win rate of 58.21% against Gudelj's 46%.
• What is each player's career best surface? Both players excel on clay; however, Olsen has a better win percentage (61%) compared to Gudelj's 44%.
• When looking at the event level, who has been more successful in the last year? Olsen has a slight edge, winning 52.78% of matches at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments compared to Gudelj's 47.06%.
• What about the caliber of opponents they have faced? Gudelj has faced higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 193.14, while Olsen's opponents had an average rank of 314.66.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, who tends to perform better? Olsen holds an advantage, winning 53% of deciding sets, while Gudelj wins 44%.
• How do they fare in breakpoint conversions in recent form? Gudelj is slightly more proficient, converting 44.74% of breakpoints compared to Olsen's 42.57%.

Editorial Prediction (July 31, 2025, UTC):

Both players demonstrate varied strengths, with Gudelj excelling in second serve returns and facing higher-ranked opponents, reflecting their ability to handle tough matches. Olsen, on the other hand, showcases a consistent edge in first serve returns and breakpoint saves, indicating strong defensive capabilities under pressure.

Historically, Olsen's performance on clay is noteworthy, and with both players favoring this surface, Olsen's superior win percentage provides a psychological advantage. Additionally, their adeptness in deciding sets further cements Olsen’s ability to capitalize on prolonged matches.

While Gudelj brings experience against formidable opponents, the overall statistics and recent trends suggest that Olsen's balance of solid returns, breakpoint management, and deciding set performance gives them a slight edge.

Considering these factors, Olsen is anticipated to emerge victorious in the upcoming matchup, leveraging their strengths in key areas.